ClickEquations Blog

A Weblog on Paid Search Marketing, Search Analytics, and Online Marketing

Posts tagged as: 'Average Position'

Secret Truth Series #13: The Average Lie

Numbers look like facts even when they’re not.

To make the best possible PPC management decisions it’s important to know the difference between the numbers in your reports which represent something that has happened and those that are mearly clues that need more investigation before you can possibly know what they really mean.

PPC Reports Don’t Present Raw Data

With thousands of keywords and hundreds of thousands of clicks (or more) in each account every day, we should be glad that the search engines or our management platforms don’t try to show us the raw data behind our accounts. It would be too much to handle.

Instead what we see are lots of sums and averages.

  • The number of clicks on a keyword is the sum of all clicks from each individual search query that was matched to that keyword.
  • The number of clicks on any search query is the sum of all clicks from each geography or person.
  • CPC, position, revenue-per-click, and many others are averages – sometimes labeled as such and othertimes not. We’re never told the distribution of the data.

Look Behind The Sums

The first place we look when reviewing our paid search accounts is at campaign and ad group level performance data. Here every number is a sum or an average.

These reports can be very useful when we’ve come to know and trust the data behind these numbers. But it’s easy to mistakenly assume or presume that the summed numbers tell you something they don’t about the contents of any one group.

  • You can’t see when two data elements cancel each other out. For example, if one ad group surged by 50% while another fell by 50%, the campaign data can report a flat month-over-month number. You can miss important changes ‘inside’ the data.
    .
  • You can’t see when one data element overwhelms the others. If an ad group shows a terrible ROI or CTR, there is no way to know that one or more keywords inside are hugely profitable or have fantastic CTRs. The good can overwhelm the bad, or visa versa.

When looking at campaign, ad group, and even keyword reports, of course you want to react to the numbers, watch their trends, and compare them to their peers. But make sure you know the numbers behind these numbers.

Before taking any action, dive in and look at the numbers underneath. You may not always have the time to make the necessary changes – so you may still need to take the broad action – but you may find that in the long run the change you had planned is not the right long term solution.

Don’t Believe The Averages

When AdWords tell us that a keyword had an average position of 3, it’s hard not to think and act as if it was ‘usually’ in position 3, or even that it was almost always at or near position 3.

But this may or may not be the case.

As Google Analytics shows, most keywords (their ads really) get placed in a very wide range of different positions and the average reported in the interface is just that – an average. The keyword you think about as having been in position 3 was probably seen by many people while in position 5 and seen by others in position 1.

Click To Zoom
This keyword was in positions as diverse as Top 1 and Left 6 during a 1 month period.

Averages without standard deviations – as someone used to tell me – are rather worthless.

The joke he told to illustrate was about a comedian told to prepare material for a birthday party where the average guest was 35 years old. As you might imagine, he included a little colorful language in the routine he had planned. Only to be shocked to arrive and find a birthday party filled with 3 year olds and their 73 year old grandparents.

Taking the distribution of the data that makes up the average into account is especially difficult when you don’t have access to it.

  • We see quality score reported for our keywords, without any way to find out the different quality scores earned across the different geographies where the associated ads were shown, or the impact of the different text ads that the keyword displayed.
    .
  • We see CPC data for each keyword, without any way to find out the different CPCs that were actually charged for each different search query that was matched, or the impact of the quality score, geography, ad copy, etc. (Did you even know that CPC was an average too?)

Don’t Believe What You Read

The Boomtown Rats had it right. The numbers we get back in PPC reporting systems are not always what they appear. Teach yourself to view them a little skeptically, and definitely not conclusively. Analysis always has to follow data.

Sums and averages are necessary because we can’t usually handle raw data. My point isn’t that these reports aren’t useful or presented properly. But rather that it’s important to know what the data is and what it isn’t, and to know how to take the next step to learn more about any particular number that raises questions.

In many cases the numbers behind the numbers are just a click away. You just need the time and inclination to go look at them. In other cases, the engines still aren’t sharing enough details, and we all need to pressure the engines (with whom we spend so much money) to provide us with the data we need to make fully informed decisions.

What Do You Think?

This blog post is part of a series extending and amplifying the ideas in our free ebook ’21 Secret Truths of High-Resolution PPC’.

What they’re saying: “If your goal is to be the best you can be at paid search, then your path goes through this book. When Craig talks I listen, mesmerized. You should too because being wise is great!.”

- Avinash KaushikAuthor of Web Analytics 2.0 ’.

Download Your Copy Today
.

.

The Average Position Metric For Keywords Is Pretty Mediocre

Average Position occupies an important place in the mythology of paid search.

Many people covet or chase higher positions, and there are several possible reasons:

  1. The assumption that ads in higher positions get more clicks simply because they’re in higher positions.
  2. As we all know ‘higher is always better’ – especially when it costs more.
  3. And of course, eye tracking studies prove, um, er, that people look higher more often.

(The empirical and anecdotal evidence I’ve seen suggests that the power of higher positions is much less than most people seem to imagine. In a future post I’ll go into this in great detail. This is not the real subject of this post.)

As a result, there is a lot of attention paid to the Average Position metric. And a LOT of money is spent on upward bid changes made because of the number this metric reports.

So how good is this number? Probably not very good.

Let’s take one tiny little case study to demonstrate.

The keyword is ‘cat treatment’. And on Saturday Jan 3rd it produced about 25 clicks in one of our accounts. The average position for the term (in broad match) was listed as 4.55. This is the average of all the positions in which it appeared during the 1543 impressions it enjoyed that day.

cattreatmentstats

Now be honest, despite all you know about averages (including the fact that it could have appeared in position #1 760 times, and in position 8 783 times) when you see that 4.55 was the average it makes you think it spent the day bouncing between position 4 and position 5. Right?

But did it?

Let’s look at Google Analytics’ handy Keyword Position report for this keyword on that day. This shows the position the keyword was in when it earned its 25 clicks.

Keyword Clicks Distribution

Yowza!  This keyword covered more ground than Paris Hilton in NYC on Saturday night. (I always wanted to see how much Google traffic a single Paris Hilton reference caused.)

It was in all three top positions, and everywhere on the right side from position 1 to position 6.

Keep in mind that this is a map of clicks, not impressions. So maybe the impressions did cluster closely around the 4.55 average and the few stray impressions way up to top 1 and down to position 6 just all got clicks. Or maybe the actual impression distribution was extremely broad and the 4.55 average, while it is true, is really not useful to us in terms of analyzing keyword performance or making bidding decisions.

At this point only two things are really clear;

  1. We really need better information. If the search engines won’t provide the actual impression and click position distributions, and/or make the the position-at-time-of-click a macro that can be delivered in the target URL, they should at least provide the standard deviation for the average position so we have some idea of what it really means.
  2. We should resist the urge to put much faith, or make too serious of decisions, based on the reported Average Position of any keyword.
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Some of Our Clients

  • Comcast
  • Clix Marketing
  • Beau-coup
  • Uncommon Goods
  • Gyro:HSR
  • Portent Interactive