<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They&#8217;re Searching For Answers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2010/01/searching-for-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2010/01/searching-for-answers/</link>
	<description>A Long Hard Look At Paid Search Marketing Strategies, Tactics, and Tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paid Search Is About Answering Questions : 21 Secret Truths of High-Resolution PPC &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2010/01/searching-for-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Paid Search Is About Answering Questions : 21 Secret Truths of High-Resolution PPC &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1833#comment-879</guid>
		<description>[...] by Craig Danuloff on February 10, 2010  The first truth from our new &#8216;21 Secret Truths of High-Resolution PPC&#8217; was leaked, on this very blog, in our New Years Day post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Craig Danuloff on February 10, 2010  The first truth from our new &#8216;21 Secret Truths of High-Resolution PPC&#8217; was leaked, on this very blog, in our New Years Day post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenniferdlugozima</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2010/01/searching-for-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>jenniferdlugozima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1833#comment-865</guid>
		<description>Simple and effective strategy.  Instead of thinking in keywords, we should think in the language of searchers: &quot;What are they looking for&quot;; &quot; What will convince them to buy&quot;, and &quot;How will they ask the question?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple and effective strategy.  Instead of thinking in keywords, we should think in the language of searchers: &#8220;What are they looking for&#8221;; &#8221; What will convince them to buy&#8221;, and &#8220;How will they ask the question?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deven_Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2010/01/searching-for-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Deven_Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1833#comment-863</guid>
		<description>And then analytics help in understanding how well the question was answered.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One way to look at the web pages is that every page is a potential entry point to the web site. And every page should focus on one question to answered, or one single thread of idea to be developed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have tried to use home page as landing page for PPC. And it wasn&#039;t as effective as to when I had landing page that is talking specifically about the keywords that I targeted in PPC campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then analytics help in understanding how well the question was answered.</p>
<p>One way to look at the web pages is that every page is a potential entry point to the web site. And every page should focus on one question to answered, or one single thread of idea to be developed.</p>
<p>I have tried to use home page as landing page for PPC. And it wasn&#39;t as effective as to when I had landing page that is talking specifically about the keywords that I targeted in PPC campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Danuloff</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2010/01/searching-for-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Danuloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1833#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bryan - Yes making sure you understand the question - interpret, infer, and/or further quality after the click is vital. Everything you&#039;ve been saying for years. The amazing thing is how often advertisers treat vastly different questions to a completely undifferentiated answer. Once we can get on the path to correcting that, we can hopefully go far - all the way to personas and beyond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bryan &#8211; Yes making sure you understand the question &#8211; interpret, infer, and/or further quality after the click is vital. Everything you&#39;ve been saying for years. The amazing thing is how often advertisers treat vastly different questions to a completely undifferentiated answer. Once we can get on the path to correcting that, we can hopefully go far &#8211; all the way to personas and beyond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Eisenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2010/01/searching-for-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Eisenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1833#comment-839</guid>
		<description>This is a great metaphor. I think where people make the biggest mistake though is understanding the intent of the question people are asking. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, I had a friend advertising for his supplements under a generic vitamin type (think vitamin C, etc.). He was advertising the benefits of the vitamin as opposed to advertising the benefit of his brand of vitamin. People searching for the vitamin type most likely understand the benefits of the vitamin, but not of his brand. As soon as he switch the ad his click-throughs went from 0.25% to over 4%. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you go through the process of understanding your different customer types or personas you can get a better sense of the questions they are asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great metaphor. I think where people make the biggest mistake though is understanding the intent of the question people are asking. </p>
<p>For example, I had a friend advertising for his supplements under a generic vitamin type (think vitamin C, etc.). He was advertising the benefits of the vitamin as opposed to advertising the benefit of his brand of vitamin. People searching for the vitamin type most likely understand the benefits of the vitamin, but not of his brand. As soon as he switch the ad his click-throughs went from 0.25% to over 4%. </p>
<p>If you go through the process of understanding your different customer types or personas you can get a better sense of the questions they are asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.clickequations.com @ 2010-07-29 17:18:36 -->