<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Google Adwords Match Type: Include</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/04/new-google-adwords-match-type-include/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/04/new-google-adwords-match-type-include/</link>
	<description>A Long Hard Look At Paid Search Marketing Strategies, Tactics, and Tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modified Expanded Broad Match and More &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/04/new-google-adwords-match-type-include/comment-page-1/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Modified Expanded Broad Match and More &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-1223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and George Michie had to say about it.The PowerWhat I think happened is that Google read our &#8216;Include Match Type&#8217; post from April 2009, and went to work on implementing it. Their solution takes that idea and improves &amp; expands it [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and George Michie had to say about it.The PowerWhat I think happened is that Google read our &#8216;Include Match Type&#8217; post from April 2009, and went to work on implementing it. Their solution takes that idea and improves &amp; expands it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Donnelly</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/04/new-google-adwords-match-type-include/comment-page-1/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Donnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Location targeting based on keywords would be helpful, ignoring IP for region targeting and excluding matches on location keywords outside of a region target.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Location targeting based on keywords would be helpful, ignoring IP for region targeting and excluding matches on location keywords outside of a region target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Donnelly</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/04/new-google-adwords-match-type-include/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Donnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Location targeting based on keywords would be helpful, ignoring IP for region targeting and excluding matches on location keywords outside of a region target.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Location targeting based on keywords would be helpful, ignoring IP for region targeting and excluding matches on location keywords outside of a region target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/04/new-google-adwords-match-type-include/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this you can make this match by adding really big list of negative words. Not only popular negative words, but real big list of negative words...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this you can make this match by adding really big list of negative words. Not only popular negative words, but real big list of negative words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamap</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/04/new-google-adwords-match-type-include/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>adamap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great suggestion. If advertisers were able to opt out of  Expanded Broad Match, or make that the 4th match type, I would be pretty happy. Broad match used to be your suggestion of &#039;Include&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great suggestion. If advertisers were able to opt out of  Expanded Broad Match, or make that the 4th match type, I would be pretty happy. Broad match used to be your suggestion of &#39;Include&#39;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Demers</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/04/new-google-adwords-match-type-include/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Demers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah I like this a lot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s a good post on how you can approach accomplishing this now: &lt;a href=&quot;http://foliovision.com/2007/11/05/adwords-expanded-broad-match/;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://foliovision.com/2007/11/05/adwords-expan...&lt;/a&gt; what&#039;s missing there obviously is when the string gets broken, as in some of your examples above (discount dog food versus get dog food at a discount).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I like this a lot.</p>
<p>There&#39;s a good post on how you can approach accomplishing this now: <a href="http://foliovision.com/2007/11/05/adwords-expanded-broad-match/;" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://foliovision.com/2007/11/05/adwords-expan" rel="nofollow">http://foliovision.com/2007/11/05/adwords-expan</a>&#8230; what&#39;s missing there obviously is when the string gets broken, as in some of your examples above (discount dog food versus get dog food at a discount).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eloi</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/04/new-google-adwords-match-type-include/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Eloi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post and idea. there is a big gap between broad and phrase, and this idea of an include match (which was the basic idea of broad match) would solve that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and idea. there is a big gap between broad and phrase, and this idea of an include match (which was the basic idea of broad match) would solve that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
