<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Quality Score Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/google-quality-score-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/google-quality-score-video/</link>
	<description>A Long Hard Look At Paid Search Marketing Strategies, Tactics, and Tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surprise: Your Bid Doesn&#8217;t Determine Your Cost-Per-Click &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/google-quality-score-video/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Surprise: Your Bid Doesn&#8217;t Determine Your Cost-Per-Click &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1152#comment-465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] fall-out from Google&#8217;s Hal Varian&#8217;s Quality Score video [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fall-out from Google&#8217;s Hal Varian&#8217;s Quality Score video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Adwords First Page Bid Estimate (Why It's An Estimate) &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/google-quality-score-video/comment-page-1/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Adwords First Page Bid Estimate (Why It's An Estimate) &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1152#comment-458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] makes sense given what we now know about how Ad Rank is calculated and the fact this is done in real-time for every query. So for each search [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] makes sense given what we now know about how Ad Rank is calculated and the fact this is done in real-time for every query. So for each search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Danuloff</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/google-quality-score-video/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Danuloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1152#comment-800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been told explicitly by a Sr. Google Rep who works with this stuff, that Landing Page cannot help QS at all, it can only hurt - meaning if the landing page is spammy or has negative characteristics your QS drops. But otherwise the landing page has ZERO impact on Quality Score. I believe this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been told explicitly by a Sr. Google Rep who works with this stuff, that Landing Page cannot help QS at all, it can only hurt &#8211; meaning if the landing page is spammy or has negative characteristics your QS drops. But otherwise the landing page has ZERO impact on Quality Score. I believe this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Danuloff</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/google-quality-score-video/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Danuloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1152#comment-450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been told explicitly by a Sr. Google Rep who works with this stuff, that Landing Page cannot help QS at all, it can only hurt - meaning if the landing page is spammy or has negative characteristics your QS drops. But otherwise the landing page has ZERO impact on Quality Score. I believe this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been told explicitly by a Sr. Google Rep who works with this stuff, that Landing Page cannot help QS at all, it can only hurt &#8211; meaning if the landing page is spammy or has negative characteristics your QS drops. But otherwise the landing page has ZERO impact on Quality Score. I believe this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Economics of Quality Score &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/google-quality-score-video/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>The Economics of Quality Score &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1152#comment-439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] recently released Google Video by Google’s Chief Economist, Hal Varian helped clarify this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently released Google Video by Google’s Chief Economist, Hal Varian helped clarify this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan PPCPROZ</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/google-quality-score-video/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan PPCPROZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=1152#comment-449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you think the pie chart of Quality score is accurate?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    * 60% CTR (“user feedback”)&lt;br&gt;    * 30% Adwords Account Architecture  (“relevancy”)&lt;br&gt;    * 10% Landing Page Factors (that’s all? -WTF)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Landing Page Factors includes: relevancy of landing page, original, easy navigation, transparent ie. privacy policy page, load time, contact us page, little use of pop ups/unders….&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Relevancy of the landing page is only a small part of the landing page formula, did you catch that?  We don’t know exactly how much power this carries, but my guess is 30%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If that is true…&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then landing page relevancy is really only:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;30% x 10% = 3% of the quality score?!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That can’t be, can it? Google prides itself on Relevancy so, how can this possibly be I ask you? I hope I’m wrong on this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think the pie chart of Quality score is accurate?</p>
<p>    * 60% CTR (“user feedback”)<br />    * 30% Adwords Account Architecture  (“relevancy”)<br />    * 10% Landing Page Factors (that’s all? -WTF)</p>
<p>Landing Page Factors includes: relevancy of landing page, original, easy navigation, transparent ie. privacy policy page, load time, contact us page, little use of pop ups/unders….</p>
<p>Relevancy of the landing page is only a small part of the landing page formula, did you catch that?  We don’t know exactly how much power this carries, but my guess is 30%.</p>
<p>If that is true…</p>
<p>Then landing page relevancy is really only:</p>
<p>30% x 10% = 3% of the quality score?!!</p>
<p>That can’t be, can it? Google prides itself on Relevancy so, how can this possibly be I ask you? I hope I’m wrong on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
