<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Match Type Keyword Trap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/</link>
	<description>A Long Hard Look At Paid Search Marketing Strategies, Tactics, and Tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hot deals</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>hot deals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never even thought about commenting till now. I guess if I really like a post I find myself checking the external links for more and favoriting (if that is a word) the post instead.nFrom now on though I&#039;ll definitely try and drop a comment every so often.nnI&#039;ve never left a comment, and rarely I comment on other blogs but I read you everyday, and often more than once a day.nnI support you on this and I&#039;ll try to leave few words here and there.nnn&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spyshelter.com&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot;&gt;Antikeylogger&lt;/a&gt;nn&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spyshelter.com&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot;&gt;anti keylogger&lt;/a&gt;n</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never even thought about commenting till now. I guess if I really like a post I find myself checking the external links for more and favoriting (if that is a word) the post instead.nFrom now on though I&#8217;ll definitely try and drop a comment every so often.nnI&#8217;ve never left a comment, and rarely I comment on other blogs but I read you everyday, and often more than once a day.nnI support you on this and I&#8217;ll try to leave few words here and there.nnn<a href="http://www.spyshelter.com" rel="dofollow">Antikeylogger</a>nn<a href="http://www.spyshelter.com" rel="dofollow">anti keylogger</a>n</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandyxxx</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>sandyxxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-727</guid>
		<description>hello buddy i read your comment i agry with you dear thanx for this information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dealshunt.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hot deals&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello buddy i read your comment i agry with you dear thanx for this information.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dealshunt.com" rel="nofollow">Hot deals</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photographworks</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>photographworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-661</guid>
		<description>Jim Hathaway&#039;s link goes to &lt;a href=&quot;http://hyperlinkguerilla.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hyperlinkguerilla.com&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s that about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Hathaway&#39;s link goes to <a href="http://hyperlinkguerilla.com" rel="nofollow">hyperlinkguerilla.com</a>  </p>
<p>What&#39;s that about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Mangement Process </title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Mangement Process </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-546</guid>
		<description>very interesting post dude.. informative.. and learnt new stuffs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting post dude.. informative.. and learnt new stuffs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fishing Vacation</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Fishing Vacation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-405</guid>
		<description>this is my favourite blog now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is my favourite blog now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin Woodward</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin Woodward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-364</guid>
		<description>this is my favourite blog now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is my favourite blog now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impression Share Deep Dive (Pt. III - Winning Back Lost Impressions) &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Impression Share Deep Dive (Pt. III - Winning Back Lost Impressions) &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-302</guid>
		<description>[...] out your match type keyword traps. Increasing coverage of exact and phrase match terms, and bidding them properly, should garner more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out your match type keyword traps. Increasing coverage of exact and phrase match terms, and bidding them properly, should garner more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Danuloff</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Danuloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Yes, that was what I was trying to say in the second sentence below. In fact, with brand terms I&#039;ve seen/found that raising bids and buying exact can lower CPC, increase volume (by causing move to top I presume) and raise IS. If the Exact match is competitive - several others are bidding it at exact - then the CPC doesn&#039;t decline, so for non-brand terms it happens less often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that was what I was trying to say in the second sentence below. In fact, with brand terms I&#39;ve seen/found that raising bids and buying exact can lower CPC, increase volume (by causing move to top I presume) and raise IS. If the Exact match is competitive &#8211; several others are bidding it at exact &#8211; then the CPC doesn&#39;t decline, so for non-brand terms it happens less often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hathaway</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hathaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Actually, in the examples I&#039;ve seen, the exact match bid was highest of the three match types, but the actual average CPC was lowest for exact match. No complaints when that happens, but haven&#039;t seen consistent behavior that could be applied to other situations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Btw, I did read your post on average position, and yes, when you look at the actual distribution in GA it&#039;s all over the map!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, in the examples I&#39;ve seen, the exact match bid was highest of the three match types, but the actual average CPC was lowest for exact match. No complaints when that happens, but haven&#39;t seen consistent behavior that could be applied to other situations.</p>
<p>Btw, I did read your post on average position, and yes, when you look at the actual distribution in GA it&#39;s all over the map!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Danuloff</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Danuloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Well as always, we&#039;re playing against a black box which may change or inconsistently apply rules - makes interpretation difficult! I have definitely seen cases where higher exact match bids result in lower (than alt match type) CPCs. The tension in the bids is between sending the right signal about the order of importance (although the match type alone should do that) and normalizing ROI across the MTs. I&#039;m leary of average POS because they average such disparate results (as I&#039;ve blogged). Will see if I can pull a CQ Analyst report showing the average position across match types, and for our own stacks, and see any trends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as always, we&#39;re playing against a black box which may change or inconsistently apply rules &#8211; makes interpretation difficult! I have definitely seen cases where higher exact match bids result in lower (than alt match type) CPCs. The tension in the bids is between sending the right signal about the order of importance (although the match type alone should do that) and normalizing ROI across the MTs. I&#39;m leary of average POS because they average such disparate results (as I&#39;ve blogged). Will see if I can pull a CQ Analyst report showing the average position across match types, and for our own stacks, and see any trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hathaway</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hathaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Craig, I&#039;ve experimented off and on with stacking bids on match types. One thing that makes me wonder is that sometimes I&#039;ll see the &quot;sweet spot&quot; for an exact match end up being a lower bid than either broad or phrase match. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, it might sometimes work out that all three match types perform well at an average position range of 3-5, but exact match has a lower CPC and higher conversion rate. Just makes me wonder if stacking bids is always going to reveal the true winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, I&#39;ve experimented off and on with stacking bids on match types. One thing that makes me wonder is that sometimes I&#39;ll see the &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; for an exact match end up being a lower bid than either broad or phrase match. </p>
<p>For example, it might sometimes work out that all three match types perform well at an average position range of 3-5, but exact match has a lower CPC and higher conversion rate. Just makes me wonder if stacking bids is always going to reveal the true winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paid Search In The Hot Sun &#124; Razvan Alexa</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Paid Search In The Hot Sun &#124; Razvan Alexa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-124</guid>
		<description>[...] could see the need to modify match types based on your search queries to build more effective match type keyword traps. This requires versioning keywords, segregating them into Ad-groups, pyramiding bids, and making [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could see the need to modify match types based on your search queries to build more effective match type keyword traps. This requires versioning keywords, segregating them into Ad-groups, pyramiding bids, and making [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paid Search In The Hot Sun &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/the-match-type-keyword-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Paid Search In The Hot Sun &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=19#comment-99</guid>
		<description>[...] could see the need to modify match types based on your search queries to build more effective match type keyword traps. This requires versioning keywords, segregating them into Ad-groups, pyramiding bids, and making [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could see the need to modify match types based on your search queries to build more effective match type keyword traps. This requires versioning keywords, segregating them into Ad-groups, pyramiding bids, and making [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

