<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Search Engines: Friend or Foe?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/</link> <description>A Long Hard Look At Paid Search Marketing Strategies, Tactics, and Tools</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Search Engines: Friend or Foe Redux &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link> <dc:creator>Search Engines: Friend or Foe Redux &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:49:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-333</guid> <description>[...] Six months ago I wrote about the way paid search advertisers view and think about paid search engines. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Six months ago I wrote about the way paid search advertisers view and think about paid search engines. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-795</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-795</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#39;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#39;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-171</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#39;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#39;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-29</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-43</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-47</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-49</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-52</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-58</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-60</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-65</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-73</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-82</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-85</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David - Los Angeles Marketing</title><link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/07/friend-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link> <dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=37#comment-91</guid> <description>Craig, you&#039;re right - and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too... Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I really am drinking the &quot;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&quot; to the extreme - have an external agency monitor the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But altogether, I don&#039;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and thanks for reminding us. However, some of the transparency did make things suck too&#8230; Remember doing the bidding game with overture? Bidding right under the comptetitor? It was fun, but knowing the exact numbers of your competition sucked&#8230;</p><p>Maybe I really am drinking the &#8220;Click Forensics Kool-Aid&#8221; to the extreme &#8211; have an external agency monitor the data.</p><p>But altogether, I don&#8217;t think much will change. Either way, the market will price itself to the budget that advertisers can make search work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 14/24 queries in 0.017 seconds using disk

Served from: 76.12.155.27 @ 2010-03-15 23:15:54 -->