<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Perfect Match Type</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/</link>
	<description>A Long Hard Look At Paid Search Marketing Strategies, Tactics, and Tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Danuloff</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Danuloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas - I wrote a post about that very issues - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/the-match-type-separation-rap/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/the-...&lt;/a&gt; - I believe in separating match types by Ad Group, and have done it with campaigns of 250K KW and higher.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas &#8211; I wrote a post about that very issues &#8211; <a href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/the-match-type-separation-rap/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/the-" rel="nofollow">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/the-</a>&#8230; &#8211; I believe in separating match types by Ad Group, and have done it with campaigns of 250K KW and higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Danuloff</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Danuloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas - I wrote a post about that very issues - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/the-match-type-separation-rap/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/the-...&lt;/a&gt; - I believe in separating match types by Ad Group, and have done it with campaigns of 250K KW and higher.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas &#8211; I wrote a post about that very issues &#8211; <a href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/the-match-type-separation-rap/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/the-" rel="nofollow">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/the-</a>&#8230; &#8211; I believe in separating match types by Ad Group, and have done it with campaigns of 250K KW and higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Craig,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thank you for this great article about match types. It was really a pleasure to read it.&lt;br&gt;But I wonder about one thing: You mention to put every match-type to a single adgroup, so you can analyze adgroups and figure out different performances etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But how do you structure your whole account then? Do you put all keywords with the same match-type and the same subject to one adgroup or do you put every keyword with its match-type to one adgroup - so you would get a bunch of adgroups in the end?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To be more exact: I&#039;m managing accounts with around 70.000 keywords (yes, already same keyword with different match-types) and I&#039;m thinking about re-structuring it. So my question is, what would be the perfect account structure in the end?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks in advance for your feedback and keep up the good work!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Thomas]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Craig,</p>
<p>thank you for this great article about match types. It was really a pleasure to read it.<br />But I wonder about one thing: You mention to put every match-type to a single adgroup, so you can analyze adgroups and figure out different performances etc.</p>
<p>But how do you structure your whole account then? Do you put all keywords with the same match-type and the same subject to one adgroup or do you put every keyword with its match-type to one adgroup &#8211; so you would get a bunch of adgroups in the end?</p>
<p>To be more exact: I&#39;m managing accounts with around 70.000 keywords (yes, already same keyword with different match-types) and I&#39;m thinking about re-structuring it. So my question is, what would be the perfect account structure in the end?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance for your feedback and keep up the good work!</p>
<p>Best,<br />Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinayseo</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>pinayseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you exactly right, thanks for the theory]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you exactly right, thanks for the theory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRILLIANT - really helped clear up some confusion!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT &#8211; really helped clear up some confusion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRILLIANT - really helped clear up some confusion!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT &#8211; really helped clear up some confusion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRILLIANT - really helped clear up some confusion!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT &#8211; really helped clear up some confusion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRILLIANT - really helped clear up some confusion!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT &#8211; really helped clear up some confusion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRILLIANT - really helped clear up some confusion!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT &#8211; really helped clear up some confusion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRILLIANT - really helped clear up some confusion!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT &#8211; really helped clear up some confusion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRILLIANT - really helped clear up some confusion!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT &#8211; really helped clear up some confusion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRILLIANT - really helped clear up some confusion!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT &#8211; really helped clear up some confusion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRILLIANT - really helped clear up some confusion!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT &#8211; really helped clear up some confusion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2008/06/the-perfect-match-type/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/?p=12#comment-110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRILLIANT - really helped clear up some confusion!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT &#8211; really helped clear up some confusion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
